|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 0 post(s) |

Lord Zim
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:32:00 -
[1] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:And BTL/TDF wern't player made? Didnt stop the huge eve comminity getting behind the risk vs isk crap to get CCP to change them incursions had no risk to them, and the changes were to curb blitzing the sites.
As someone else said, abloo bloo bloo my cheating got nerfed, I'm going to make 15073498729384 whiny threads about it. |

Lord Zim
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:37:00 -
[2] - Quote
Talon SilverHawk wrote:Tinnin Sylph wrote:ABLOO BLOO GOONS WON AT EVE AND I'M MAD ABOUT IT. Agreed you guys did good, but you should be able to be challenged in game, otherwise boring it will become. Tal Nobody's stopping you from doing so. The NC was bigger, and the NC was taken down in a matter of a few months. Stop being whiny bitches and organize. |

Lord Zim
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:38:00 -
[3] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Well renters as far as i knew were never given high end goodies. We don't do renters, we do allies. Hope that helps. |

Lord Zim
701
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 10:47:00 -
[4] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Devious Relation wrote:Cmon, lets be serious, we all know its broken. Fix the UI then fix the game, instead of working on ship skins etc Whats broken about the UI? IT WAS CHANGED AND I'M NOT USED TO IT THEREFORE IT IS BROKEN AND I MUST UNSUB ABOUT IT :AAAA: |

Lord Zim
702
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:18:00 -
[5] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:How is ANY up comming alliance even ment to get close to challenging the tech holding large established alliances?? The same was said of the NC. Where are they now? Oh right, they're gone because some people weren't whiny bitches and actually did something about them.
|

Lord Zim
702
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:26:00 -
[6] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Ok Lord, how are you supposed to tackle a enemy with UNLIMITED ISK and funding? please educate us all By realizing that "unlimited isk" isn't an "I win" button. The NC had "unlimited isk" for a long, long time, and they're gone. |

Lord Zim
702
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:30:00 -
[7] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Devious Relation wrote:Ok Lord, how are you supposed to tackle a enemy with UNLIMITED ISK and funding? please educate us all By realizing that "unlimited isk" isn't an "I win" button. The NC had "unlimited isk" for a long, long time, and they're gone. Unlimited ISK is a Iwin button, and the longer the game stays as it is the worse the situation becomes. The only hope for anyone is that large alliances implode. It shouldnt be like this Funny how that "I win" button didn't work for the NC then, eh? |

Lord Zim
702
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 11:38:00 -
[8] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:I am unsure of the exact way the NC fell so cannot get into details.
But I think its fairly safe to assume it was because of a alliance between other alliances with alot of ISK, moms and titans which took them down. Reitterating the fact, there comes a tiem when people realise, join a established alliance or move on Hey, so, why are you so hell-bent on taking space in the north, anyways? |

Lord Zim
704
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 12:43:00 -
[9] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Im not interested in taking any space what so ever, I'm actualy comming to the end of my "eve life" i think. Getting so bored of the same stuff over and over. I am meerly interested in firstly, making the "pubbies" masses aweare of this NTEC agreement, and secondly putting it on the table that Moon goo is far more game breaking than incursions ever were. Well, see, these "new fledging alliances" you speak so highly of would, if they wanted to go after tech, simply have to find space somewhere where they can actually take the space, like down south. They would have to build up relations with their neighbours and build up a warchest and a competent fleet of people. And once that's done, once they think they have enough, they can start moving up the ladder.
There's absolutely no game mechanic which is in the game right now, which is stopping anyone from toppling the CFC off of tech, it's just a matter of organization and coordination. |

Lord Zim
704
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 12:48:00 -
[10] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Lord Zim wrote:There's absolutely no game mechanic which is in the game right now, which is stopping anyone from toppling the CFC off of tech, it's just a matter of organization and coordination. Except Sov and the Jump mechanics. Since when did the sov mechanics stop anyone from taking space if they really, really wanted it? And what does the "jump mechanics" have to do with anything here? |
|

Lord Zim
704
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:29:00 -
[11] - Quote
So I hear timezone wars are a thing in the real world. |

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:43:00 -
[12] - Quote
Oh, I see, we hold sov purely because of ... timezones.
Nerf timezones. |

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 13:46:00 -
[13] - Quote
I can get down with removing any and all reinforcement timers. |

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:48:00 -
[14] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:1.So you are saying if force fields are developed in RL they will have "reinforcement timers" on them? Seriously? Real life != a game.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:2.Last time I checked the US has bases all around the world so that it can get a very small fraction of it's firepower anywhere in the world in 24 hours. That is because that small fraction of it's firepower was already bases 90% of the way there.
These strategic bases are a division of forces that is necessary for the US to have that response time. This is not in anyway present in Eve thanks to Jump Drive tardism. Thank you for further proving my point. What you actually mean to say is that these strategic bases aren't replicated in EVE because of the SOV system, not because of the jump drives. Unless you mean to say that when we derp around with 1000 subcaps, they're all magically moved around by jumpdrives instead of, oh I dunno, using gates.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:3.All the moons ARE almost entirely in one place which is what makes OPEC not at all like stupid tech monopoly. Also, OPEC is not "almost all oil production" either. Again, you are just making stuff up. http://www.opec.org/opec_web/en/data_graphs/330.htm |

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 15:58:00 -
[15] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Goon are such liars. I know the truth hurts, and being in denial makes the pain go away. But push through it, it'll get better soon! |

Lord Zim
706
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:02:00 -
[16] - Quote
Hey so if we're controlling 90% of the tech moons, and providing 90% of the tech on the market, doesn't that actually make us less moneygrabby than OPEC? |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:19:00 -
[17] - Quote
Darth Kilth wrote:0.0 is pretty much the biggest carebear place around currently. The big alliances have no reason to fight each other and have literally zero risk within their own territory that they barely have to bother defending. Let's ask White Noise how they feel about risk. Or the NC. Or CVA. Or ev0ke. Or any alliance which is in, or has been in nullsec the last 5 years.
Darth Kilth wrote:Either way, moon mining is rather imbalanced in the way the 0.0 alliances are currently working. And the more time it takes to fix this how harder it will be to even challenge these alliances. Don't say we didn't warn you. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 16:35:00 -
[18] - Quote
Darth Kilth wrote:or NC who got their ass kicked in their own hubris? I specifically meant the big alliances that haven't pissed of everyone (except the goons because they can do that and get away scot free) and got enough fire-power to make themselves an unattractive target. Yes, the NC. The coalition where a majority of EVE said "the NC is killing eve", because the NC was so huge and had "so much firepower to make themselves an unattractive target". That NC. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 17:56:00 -
[19] - Quote
alittlebirdy wrote:Sorry tech moons have no current risk Have you even seen a tech moon?
alittlebirdy wrote:CCP needs to either rollback the changes to incrusions ahahahahahahahahahaha
No.
alittlebirdy wrote:OR nerf the **** out of moons in general. Remove T2 from the game, moons in general nerfed. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:21:00 -
[20] - Quote
Nah man, what you do is shoot the mothership as sooon as possible. That really ticks them off. |
|

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:43:00 -
[21] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:And how do you spose the average joe does that then?......... exactly its not possible for anyone without a huge alliance and massive funding - like a tech moon or 2 - to even consider doing so Did white noise etc have a fucktonne of tech moons before they took down an entity which was just as big if not bigger than the CFC? No? Well then. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 18:55:00 -
[22] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Moon Goo offers these large alliances the ISK required to actualy gain and keep numbers. Even actualy get people pvping. We were doing this well before we got tech.
Devious Relation wrote:At the end of the day lets be honest, who will fit a real pvpship more then once a day, go die, get podded then reship and go back for more if they arnt being offer'd some part of that honey pot? This is the difference in thinking between those who can actually make it in nullsec, and those who are going to stay in hisec forever. |

Lord Zim
708
|
Posted - 2012.05.26 19:11:00 -
[23] - Quote
Devious Relation wrote:Goons are a group formed outside of eve via SA forums which you have to pay $10 to join. I haven't paid $10.
Devious Relation wrote:The only way CFC or any of the large powerhouses that are currently in existance will be knocked off thier perch is by internal issues, nothing anyone outside the diplomats/alliance highbee's can perform Goons/CFC aren't invincible just because a portion of us are members of the SA forums. And, again, if you took your sentence and replace CFC with NC, BOB, etc, you'd end up with exactly the same thing people were saying a few years ago, and that's been proven wrong.
CFC'll be killed off at some point in the future as well, the question is just when, and by whom. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 18:10:00 -
[24] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:competition to Goon tech moon income The what? |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:20:00 -
[25] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Are you worried your unearned wealth will be taken away? How can he be worried about something happening which we've been advocating for years already?
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:You claim you fought hard for it, but did you really? And was that fight REALLY risky enough to justify your reward? Yes, we have, and yes, it was.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:I say that you DID NOT earn that much wealth, and it should be removed TODAY. You know where our moons are, come and take them if you think CCP isn't working quickly enough for you.
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:About 1/4 your current tech moon income would be fair, I think. I'm pretty sure you'll keep whining even if we went further down than that. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:24:00 -
[26] - Quote
What blueball? |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:36:00 -
[27] - Quote
Alaekessa wrote:I personally think that they should all slowly deplete and then need to be rescanned to discover what else is available to be mined. Sounds like a recipe for even higher moongoo prices. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 19:57:00 -
[28] - Quote
Pretty certain a more palatable solution for everyone is an expansion of alchemy to deal with R32s as well, along with maybe ringmining (if CCP are still actually going to implement that). |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 20:48:00 -
[29] - Quote
Caecilia Arene wrote:I absolutely agree, in principle, that passive income like this has to be removed to something exploration. However, the chances for catastrophe is much higher than in most new enhancements or fixes. Which of these activities are passive, and order them in the order of passivity, least passive first:
Planetary Interaction Mining Moon mining Datacores Ratting Moon reaction Mission |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:47:00 -
[30] - Quote
And this, ladies and gentlemen, is what happens when people like Jessie-A take the wrong pills when they get up in the morning. |
|

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 21:58:00 -
[31] - Quote
baltec1 wrote:Having lived through most of the history of 0.0 I can safely say that every single superpower in EVE has had the same thing said against them and all of them have fallen. Titans were nerfed because they were game breaking not because goons told CCP to do something. If I had a dollar for every time I've told Jessie-A exactly that, I'd be a rich man. But since I'm "A Goon", I'm automatically lying.
Except I haven't lied about a single thing here. vOv |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:05:00 -
[32] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf. Why? Using which logic? |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:10:00 -
[33] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Lord Zim wrote:Jessie-A Tassik wrote:Well, the disbanding could have been ruled illegal and they could have been regranted their territory. That would make even more sense than the Titan Nerf. Why? Using which logic? The logic that one person couldn't really click their heels together and cause an empire to lose control of all its' territory? I mean really, it's logically insane that one "traitor" could magically cause a nation to suddenly "not have sov" over itself. How? He has a really, really long talk with the local police in a few thousand systems and they all decide "they no longer answer to BoB"? What? Oh, I'm sorry, here I thought you were one of those who wanted EVE to be a dangerous place, with actual risk.
I guess you just wanted easier ganking after all. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:14:00 -
[34] - Quote
Jessie-A Tassik wrote:I don't want the blatant abuse of a poor corporation interface to replace actual fights, no.
Of course, without such hacks, Goons wouldn't be doing so well, would they? Don't worry, BOB were being defeated at the time anyways. As was mentioned earlier, sirmolle made a tactical error and got locked into PR- for a ... while, and in the meantime their entire space got razed to the ground.
But I guess "facts" are "lies" in your current sperg state. vOv |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:21:00 -
[35] - Quote
You know, I'm starting to think someone's made Jesse-A mad. |

Lord Zim
715
|
Posted - 2012.05.27 22:27:00 -
[36] - Quote
Alavaria Fera wrote:Lord Zim wrote:You know, I'm starting to think someone's made Jesse-A mad. Hard to tell with NPC corp forum alts.. Nah. This is stereotypical "I'm so mad I'm literally crying blood" mad. |

Lord Zim
716
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 02:13:00 -
[37] - Quote
I'm CCP Spartacus |

Lord Zim
716
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 02:37:00 -
[38] - Quote
Look at that incoherent frothy sperg. LOOK AT IT. |

Lord Zim
717
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 10:24:00 -
[39] - Quote
Frying Doom wrote:Well at least you seem to disagree with the other Null sec residents. They don't seem to believe there is a difference between Null and Wormhole space besides the loss of local. There are minor issues such as mass limits and the need for finding new entrances when they either run out of time or out of mass, but they're small enough hindrances that there are more than enough people who mine ABCs to their heart's content, compress the ore and ship it to k-space regularly.
Frying Doom wrote:And you are right I honestly know little about tech moons other than they have one again caused a bottleneck in production. You know "goons have them" and want to do anything to get to the state where "goons don't have them". Anything, except actually take them away from us, of course, because that requires effort. |

Lord Zim
717
|
Posted - 2012.05.28 10:25:00 -
[40] - Quote
sweetrock wrote:Lord Zim wrote:I'm CCP Spartacus Where is the pit of death when you need to kick someone into it? No wait, different movie? Yeah, I'm the one slipping **** in ass of Illithya instead. |
|
|
|
|